<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Bright Lines &#187; Browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebrightlines.com/tag/browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebrightlines.com</link>
	<description>HTML, CSS, Javascript and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>No sign of @font-face in Chrome 4</title>
		<link>http://www.thebrightlines.com/2009/11/07/no-sign-of-font-face-in-chrome-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thebrightlines.com/2009/11/07/no-sign-of-font-face-in-chrome-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wouter Bos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webfonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fonts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebrightlines.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still no sign of Google Chrome supporting @font-face. Even not in version 4.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" src="/article-data/images/logo-chrome.png" alt="Google Chrome" /> A few days ago I blogged about <a href="/2009/11/01/the-trouble-with-font-face/">Chrome being the only browser that is not supporting CSS&#8217;s @font-face</a> which enables you to use non-system fonts in your website. It seems that that doesn&#8217;t change with Google Chrome 4 beta that has been out since 2 November.</p>
<p>What did change is the addition of browser synchronization. Now it&#8217;s possible to synchronize your bookmarks between all your Chrome browsers on different computers. Chrome&#8217;s performance is improved as well.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.thebrightlines.com/2009/11/01/the-trouble-with-font-face/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The trouble with @font-face'>The trouble with @font-face</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.thebrightlines.com/2010/01/12/implementing-font-face-cross-domain/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Implementing font-face cross domain'>Implementing font-face cross domain</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.thebrightlines.com/2010/03/18/font-rendering-in-ie9/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Web font rendering in IE9'>Web font rendering in IE9</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.thebrightlines.com/2010/01/03/new-rss-feeds/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: New RSS feeds'>New RSS feeds</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.thebrightlines.com/2010/01/20/webfont-pitfalls/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Webfont pitfalls'>Webfont pitfalls</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thebrightlines.com/2009/11/07/no-sign-of-font-face-in-chrome-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banning IE6 is banning visitors</title>
		<link>http://www.thebrightlines.com/2009/10/24/respect-users-with-ie6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thebrightlines.com/2009/10/24/respect-users-with-ie6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wouter Bos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebrightlines.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web developers are campaigning against IE6. A bit too early if you ask me. More than 10% of the internet users browse the net with IE6.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Save IE6" src="/article-data/images/badge_saveie6.gif" alt="Save IE6" width="113" height="118" />This year the hunt was opened for IE6. Web developers are fed up with the browser that had been around since 2001. If you want that your website supports IE6, you limit your possibilities. So some decided to do start a campaign against IE6.</p>
<p>This situation is not new. Before IE6 everyone had to deal with the ancient Netscape 4.7 that just not seem to be willing to die. I decided not to support IE6 for The Bright Lines. But that was an easy decision to make: this website focuses on web developers. And those people do care about new browsers with new features. Since I could not imagine a web developer that feels comfortable with IE6 as his main browser I dropped the whole idea of supporting IE6.</p>
<p>But what if I would target a more general public? Than I would support IE6 without (much) hesitation. IE6 might be the most crappiest browser at the moment, it is still one of the major browsers with a market share of more than 10%. That&#8217;s still more than Chrome, Safari or Opera.</p>
<p>And why did you start a website in the first place? To publish content. If that&#8217;s your goal I wouldn&#8217;t risk scaring away one out of every 10 visitors. IE6 didn&#8217;t scare us from making websites in 2003, so why would it now?</p>
<p>By the way, if you want to have a laugh: <a title="Save IE6" href="http://www.saveie6.com/">visit this funny answer to all the &#8220;Ban IE6&#8243;-websites</a>.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thebrightlines.com/2009/10/24/respect-users-with-ie6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

